Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 3 authors, 2016-02-27

Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/3] mm/zsmalloc: increase ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE

From: Sergey Senozhatsky <hidden>
Date: 2016-02-22 10:42:11
Also in: lkml

On (02/22/16 13:41), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
quoted
oh, sure.

so let's keep dynamic page allocation out of sight for now.
I'll do more tests with the increase ORDER and if it's OK then
hopefully we can just merge it, it's quite simple and shouldn't
interfere with any of the changes you are about to introduce.
Thanks.

And as another idea, we could try fallback approach that
we couldn't meet nr_pages to minimize wastage so let's fallback
to order-0 page like as-is. It will enhance, at least than now
with small-amount of code compared to dynmaic page allocation.

speaking of fallback,
with bigger ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER 'normal' classes also become bigger.

PATCHED

     6   128           0            1            96         78          3                1
     7   144           0            1           256        104          9                9
     8   160           0            1           128         80          5                5
     9   176           0            1           256         78         11               11
    10   192           1            1           128         99          6                3
    11   208           0            1           256         52         13               13
    12   224           1            1           512        472         28                7
    13   240           0            1           256         70         15               15
    14   256           1            1            64         49          4                1
    15   272           0            1            60         48          4                1


BASE

     6   128           0            1            96         83          3                1
     7   144           0            1           170        113          6                3
     8   160           0            1           102         72          4                2
     9   176           1            0            93         75          4                4
    10   192           0            1           128        104          6                3
    11   208           1            1            78         52          4                2
    12   224           1            1           511        475         28                4
    13   240           1            1            85         73          5                1
    14   256           1            1            64         53          4                1
    15   272           1            0            45         43          3                1


_techically_, zsmalloc is correct.
for instance, in 11 pages we can store 4096 * 11 / 176 == 256 objects.
256 * 176 == 45056, which is 4096 * 11. so if zspage for class_size 176 will contain 11
order-0 pages, we can count on 0 bytes of unused space once zspage will become ZS_FULL.

but it's ugly, because I think this will introduce bigger internal fragmentation, which,
in some cases, can be handled by compaction, but I'd prefer to touch only ->huge classes
and keep the existing behaviour for normal classes.

so I'm currently thinking of doing something like this

#define ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER	2
#define ZS_MAX_HUGE_ZSPAGE_ORDER	4
#define ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE (_AC(1, UL) << ZS_MAX_ZSPAGE_ORDER)
#define ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_HUGE_ZSPAGE (_AC(1, UL) << ZS_MAX_HUGE_ZSPAGE_ORDER)


so, normal classes have ORDER of 2. huge classes, however, as a fallback, can grow
up to ZS_MAX_HUGE_ZSPAGE_ORDER pages.


extend only ->huge classes: pages == 1 && get_maxobj_per_zspage(class_size, pages) == 1.

like this:

static int __get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size, int max_pages)
{
        int i, max_usedpc = 0;
        /* zspage order which gives maximum used size per KB */
        int max_usedpc_order = 1;

        for (i = 1; i <= max_pages; i++) {
                int zspage_size;
                int waste, usedpc;

                zspage_size = i * PAGE_SIZE;
                waste = zspage_size % class_size;
                usedpc = (zspage_size - waste) * 100 / zspage_size;

                if (usedpc > max_usedpc) {
                        max_usedpc = usedpc;
                        max_usedpc_order = i;
                }
        }

        return max_usedpc_order;
}

static int get_pages_per_zspage(int class_size)
{
        /* normal class first */
        int pages = __get_pages_per_zspage(class_size,
                        ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_ZSPAGE);

        /* test if the class is ->huge and try to turn it into a normal one */
        if (pages == 1 &&
                        get_maxobj_per_zspage(class_size, pages) == 1) {
                pages = __get_pages_per_zspage(class_size,
                                ZS_MAX_PAGES_PER_HUGE_ZSPAGE);
        }

        return pages;
}

	-ss

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help