On (02/22/16 13:54), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]

quoted

well, at the same time zram must not dictate what to do. zram simply spoils
zsmalloc; it does not offer guaranteed good compression, and it does not let
zsmalloc to do it's job. zram has only excuses to be the way it is.
the existing zram->zsmalloc dependency looks worse than zsmalloc->zram to me.

I don't get it why you think it's zram->zsmalloc dependency.

clearly 'dependency' was simply a wrong word to use, 'enforcement' or 'policy'
are better choices here. but you got my point.

	-ss

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>