Thread (81 messages) 81 messages, 6 authors, 2014-07-23

Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] slub: fallback to get_numa_mem() node if we want to allocate on memoryless node

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-07 17:50:02
Also in: linuxppc-dev

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
quoted
This check wouild need to be something that checks for other contigencies
in the page allocator as well. A simple solution would be to actually run
a GFP_THIS_NODE alloc to see if you can grab a page from the proper node.
If that fails then fallback. See how fallback_alloc() does it in slab.
Hello, Christoph.

This !node_present_pages() ensure that allocation on this node cannot succeed.
So we can directly use numa_mem_id() here.
Yes of course we can use numa_mem_id().

But the check is only for not having any memory at all on a node. There
are other reason for allocations to fail on a certain node. The node could
have memory that cannot be reclaimed, all dirty, beyond certain
thresholds, not in the current set of allowed nodes etc etc.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help