Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] slub: search partial list on numa_mem_id(), instead of numa_node_id()
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2014-02-06 08:38:45
Also in:
linuxppc-dev
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2014-02-06 08:38:45
Also in:
linuxppc-dev
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
Currently, if allocation constraint to node is NUMA_NO_NODE, we search a partial slab on numa_node_id() node. This doesn't work properly on the system having memoryless node, since it can have no memory on that node and there must be no partial slab on that node. On that node, page allocation always fallback to numa_mem_id() first. So searching a partial slab on numa_node_id() in that case is proper solution for memoryless node case. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <redacted>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> I think you'll need to send these to Andrew since he appears to be picking up slub patches these days. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>