Re: [PATCH 22/49] mm: mempolicy: Add MPOL_MF_LAZY
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2013-01-07 15:14:37
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:18:17PM -0600, Simon Jeons wrote:
quoted
+static int +change_prot_numa_range(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, + unsigned long address) +{ + pgd_t *pgd; + pud_t *pud; + pmd_t *pmd; + pte_t *pte, *_pte; + struct page *page; + unsigned long _address, end; + spinlock_t *ptl; + int ret = 0; + + VM_BUG_ON(address & ~PAGE_MASK); + + pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address); + if (!pgd_present(*pgd)) + goto out; + + pud = pud_offset(pgd, address); + if (!pud_present(*pud)) + goto out; + + pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address); + if (pmd_none(*pmd)) + goto out; + + if (pmd_trans_huge_lock(pmd, vma) == 1) { + int page_nid; + ret = HPAGE_PMD_NR; + + VM_BUG_ON(address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK); + + if (pmd_numa(*pmd)) { + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); + goto out; + } + + page = pmd_page(*pmd); + + /* only check non-shared pages */ + if (page_mapcount(page) != 1) { + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); + goto out; + } + + page_nid = page_to_nid(page); + + if (pmd_numa(*pmd)) { + spin_unlock(&mm->page_table_lock); + goto out; + } +Hi Gorman, Since pmd_trans_huge_lock has already held &mm->page_table_lock, then why check pmd_numa(*pmd) again?
It looks like oversight. I've added a TODO item to clean it up when I revisit NUMA balancing some time soon. Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>