Re: [PATCH] mm: Downgrade mmap_sem before locking or populating on mmap
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date: 2012-12-14 11:15:13
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:49:43PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:quoted
This is a serious cause of mmap_sem contention. MAP_POPULATE and MCL_FUTURE, in particular, are disastrous in multithreaded programs. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> --- Sensible people use anonymous mappings. I write kernel patches :) I'm not entirely thrilled by the aesthetics of this patch. The MAP_POPULATE case could also be improved by doing it without any lock at all. This is still a big improvement, though.Wait a minute. get_user_pages() relies on ->mmap_sem being held. Unless I'm seriously misreading your patch it removes that protection. And yes, I'm aware of execve-related exception; it's in special circumstances - bprm->mm is guaranteed to be not shared (and we need to rearchitect that area anyway, but that's a separate story).
Unless I completely screwed up the patch, ->mmap_sem is still held for read (it's downgraded from write). It's just not held for write anymore. --Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>