Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add movablecore_map boot option
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-11-29 11:05:42
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:38:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Tony, 2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:quoted
quoted
1. use firmware information According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory Affinity Structure". If we use the information, we might be able to specify movable memory by firmware. For example, if Hot Pluggable Filed is enabled, Linux sets the memory as movable memory. 2. use boot option This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use as movable memory.Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To pick good values for theYes.quoted
movable areas, they need to know how the memory lines up across node boundaries ... because they need to make sure to allow some non-movable memory allocations on each node so that the kernel can take advantage of node locality.There is no problem. Linux has already two boot options, kernelcore= and movablecore=. So if we use them, non-movable memory is divided into each node evenly.
The motivation for those options was to reserve a percentage of memory to be used for hugepage allocation. If hugepages were not being used at a particular time then they could be used for other purposes. While the system could in theory face lowmem/highmem style problems, in practice it did not happen because the memory would be allocated as hugetlbfs pages and unavailable anyway. The same does not really apply to a general purpose system that you want to support memory hot-remove on so be wary of lowmem/highmem style problems caused by relying too heavily on ZONE_MOVABLE. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>