On 11/27/2012 01:47 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:

At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:

quoted

On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:

quoted

Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.

... but *much* harder for users, so movable_node is better in most cases.

But numa is initialized very later, and we need the information in SRAT...

Thanks
Wen Congyang

I think you need to deal with it for usability reasons, though...


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>