Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 2 authors, 2012-11-01

Re: [PART2 Patch] node: cleanup node_state_attr

From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2012-11-01 21:29:49
Also in: lkml

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
index af1a177..5d7731e 100644
--- a/drivers/base/node.c
+++ b/drivers/base/node.c
@@ -614,23 +614,23 @@ static ssize_t show_node_state(struct device *dev,
 	{ __ATTR(name, 0444, show_node_state, NULL), state }
 
 static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = {
-	_NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE),
-	_NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE),
-	_NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY),
-	_NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU),
+	[N_POSSIBLE] = _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE),
+	[N_ONLINE] = _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE),
+	[N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY),
 #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
-	_NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY),
+	[N_HIGH_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY),
 #endif
+	[N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU),
 };
 
Why change the index for N_CPU?
N_CPU > N_HIGH_MEMORY

We use this array to create attr file in sysfs. So changing the index for N_CPU
doesn't cause any other problem.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help