Re: [PART2 Patch] node: cleanup node_state_attr
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Date: 2012-10-31 18:29:23
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c index af1a177..5d7731e 100644 --- a/drivers/base/node.c +++ b/drivers/base/node.c@@ -614,23 +614,23 @@ static ssize_t show_node_state(struct device *dev, { __ATTR(name, 0444, show_node_state, NULL), state } static struct node_attr node_state_attr[] = { - _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE), - _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE), - _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY), - _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU), + [N_POSSIBLE] = _NODE_ATTR(possible, N_POSSIBLE), + [N_ONLINE] = _NODE_ATTR(online, N_ONLINE), + [N_NORMAL_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_normal_memory, N_NORMAL_MEMORY), #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM - _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY), + [N_HIGH_MEMORY] = _NODE_ATTR(has_high_memory, N_HIGH_MEMORY), #endif + [N_CPU] = _NODE_ATTR(has_cpu, N_CPU), };
Why change the index for N_CPU?
static struct attribute *node_state_attrs[] = {
- &node_state_attr[0].attr.attr,
- &node_state_attr[1].attr.attr,
- &node_state_attr[2].attr.attr,
- &node_state_attr[3].attr.attr,
+ &node_state_attr[N_POSSIBLE].attr.attr,
+ &node_state_attr[N_ONLINE].attr.attr,
+ &node_state_attr[N_NORMAL_MEMORY].attr.attr,
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
- &node_state_attr[4].attr.attr,
+ &node_state_attr[N_HIGH_MEMORY].attr.attr,
#endif
+ &node_state_attr[N_CPU].attr.attr,
NULL
};
-- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>