Re: [PATCH v7 06/16] tracepoint: use new hashtable implementation
From: Sasha Levin <hidden>
Date: 2012-10-29 17:29:48
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-nfs, lkml, netdev
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers [off-list ref] wrote:
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@gmail.com) wrote:quoted
Switch tracepoints to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of generic unrelated code in the tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <redacted> --- kernel/tracepoint.c | 27 +++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c index d96ba22..854df92 100644 --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/static_key.h> +#include <linux/hashtable.h> extern struct tracepoint * const __start___tracepoints_ptrs[]; extern struct tracepoint * const __stop___tracepoints_ptrs[];@@ -49,8 +50,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(tracepoint_module_list); * Protected by tracepoints_mutex. */ #define TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS 6 -#define TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE (1 << TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS) -static struct hlist_head tracepoint_table[TRACEPOINT_TABLE_SIZE]; +static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(tracepoint_table, TRACEPOINT_HASH_BITS);[...]quoted
@@ -722,6 +715,8 @@ struct notifier_block tracepoint_module_nb = { static int init_tracepoints(void) { + hash_init(tracepoint_table); + return register_module_notifier(&tracepoint_module_nb); } __initcall(init_tracepoints);So we have a hash table defined in .bss (therefore entirely initialized to NULL), and you add a call to "hash_init", which iterates on the whole array and initialize it to NULL (again) ? This extra initialization is redundant. I think it should be removed from here, and hashtable.h should document that hash_init() don't need to be called on zeroed memory (which includes static/global variables, kzalloc'd memory, etc).
This was discussed in the previous series, the conclusion was to call hash_init() either way to keep the encapsulation and consistency. It's cheap enough and happens only once, so why not? Thanks, Sasha -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>