On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:38:55PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:

 > >  > Sounds good.  Is it possible to verify that policy_cache isn't getting 
 > >  > larger than normal in /proc/slabinfo, i.e. when all processes with a 
 > >  > task mempolicy or shared vma policy have exited, are there still a 
 > >  > significant number of active objects?
 > > 
 > > Killing the fuzzer caused it to drop dramatically.
 > > 
 > Excellent, thanks.  This shows that the refcounting is working properly 
 > and we're not leaking any references as a result of this change causing 
 > the mempolicies to never be freed.  ("numa_policy" turns out to be 
 > policy_cache in the code, so thanks for checking both of them.)
 > 
 > Could I add your tested-by?

Sure. Here's a fresh one I just baked.

Tested-by: Dave Jones <redacted>

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>