Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-28 14:28:32
Also in:
lkml
From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-28 14:28:32
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK, which is conditional to KMEMCHECK. This simple patch makes it unconditional.
__GFP_NOTRACK is only used in context where CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is defined? If that is not the case then you need to define GFP_NOTRACK and substitute it where necessary. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>