Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 5 authors, 2012-10-16

Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-09-28 13:20:04
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:56:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be
defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK,
which is conditional to KMEMCHECK.

This simple patch makes it unconditional.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <redacted>
CC: Christoph Lameter <redacted>
CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help