Re: [PATCH] make GFP_NOTRACK flag unconditional
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-09-28 13:20:04
Also in:
lkml
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2012-09-28 13:20:04
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:56:34PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
There was a general sentiment in a recent discussion (See https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/18/258) that the __GFP flags should be defined unconditionally. Currently, the only offender is GFP_NOTRACK, which is conditional to KMEMCHECK. This simple patch makes it unconditional. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <redacted> CC: Christoph Lameter <redacted> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>