On 08/06/2012 11:11 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:

On Mon 06-08-12 10:27:25, Rik van Riel wrote:

quoted

quoted

So you think we shouldn't do the full round over memcgs in shrink_zone a
and rather do it oom way to pick up a victim and hammer it?

Not hammer it too far.  Only until its score ends up well
below (25% lower?) than that of the second highest scoring
list.

That way all the lists get hammered a little bit, in turn.

How do we provide the soft limit guarantee then?

[...]

The easiest way would be to find the top 2 or 3 scoring memcgs
when we reclaim memory. After reclaiming some pages, recalculate
the scores of just these top lists, and see if the list we started
out with now has a lower score than the second one.

Once we have reclaimed some from each of the 2 or 3 lists, we can
go back and find the highest priority lists again.

Direct reclaim only reclaims a little bit at a time, anyway.

For kswapd, we could also remember the number of pages the group
has in excess of its soft limit, and recalculate after that...

-- 
All rights reversed

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>