Re: [PATCH 1/2] slub: rename cpu_partial to max_cpu_object

(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
[PATCH 1/2] slub: rename cpu_partial to max_cpu_object · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2012-08-24
[PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node · Joonsoo Kim <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node · JoonSoo Kim <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial_node · JoonSoo Kim <hidden> · 2012-08-24
Re: [PATCH 1/2] slub: rename cpu_partial to max_cpu_object · Christoph Lameter <hidden> · 2012-08-24

From: Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date: 2012-08-24 16:12:59
Also in: lkml

On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, Joonsoo Kim wrote:

cpu_partial of kmem_cache struct is a bit awkward.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <redacted>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help