Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Restructure kmem_cache_create() to move debug cache integrity checks into a new function
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Date: 2012-08-16 06:40:15
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 10:40:18 -0600 Shuah Khan [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
kmem_cache_create() does cache integrity checks when CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is defined. These checks interspersed with the regular code path has lead to compile time warnings when compiled without CONFIG_DEBUG_VM defined. Restructuring the code to move the integrity checks in to a new function would eliminate the current compile warning problem and also will allow for future changes to the debug only code to evolve without introducing new warnings in the regular path. This restructuring work is based on the discussion in the following thread:Your patch appears to be against some ancient old kernel, such as 3.5. I did this:--- a/mm/slab_common.c~mm-slab_commonc-restructure-kmem_cache_create-to-move-debug-cache-integrity-checks-into-a-new-function-fix +++ a/mm/slab_common.c@@ -101,15 +101,8 @@ struct kmem_cache *kmem_cache_create(con get_online_cpus(); mutex_lock(&slab_mutex); - - if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size)) - goto oops; - - s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor); - -#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM -oops: -#endif + if (kmem_cache_sanity_check(name, size) == 0) + s = __kmem_cache_create(name, size, align, flags, ctor); mutex_unlock(&slab_mutex); put_online_cpus();
Yup. Shuah, care to spin another version against slab/next? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>