Re: [RFC][PATCH 14/26] sched, numa: Numa balancer
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-09 12:07:17
Also in:
lkml
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-09 12:07:17
Also in:
lkml
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 14:26 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
quoted
+/* + * Assumes symmetric NUMA -- that is, each node is of equal size. + */ +static void set_max_mem_load(unsigned long load) +{ + unsigned long old_load; + + spin_lock(&max_mem_load.lock); + old_load = max_mem_load.load; + if (!old_load) + old_load = load; + max_mem_load.load = (old_load + load) >> 1; + spin_unlock(&max_mem_load.lock); +}The above in your patch kind of conflicts with this bit from patch 6/26:
Yeah,.. its pretty broken. Its also effectively disabled, but yeah.
Looking at how the memory load code is used, I wonder if it would make sense to count "zone size - free - inactive file" pages instead?
Something like that, although I guess we'd want a sum over all zones in a node for that. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>