Re: [PATCH 4/9] memcg: dirty page accounting support routines
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden>
Date: 2012-02-29 01:17:23
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:45:07 -0800 Andrew Morton [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:00:26 +0800 Fengguang Wu [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Greg Thelen <redacted> Added memcg dirty page accounting support routines. These routines are used by later changes to provide memcg aware writeback and dirty page limiting. A mem_cgroup_dirty_info() tracepoint is is also included to allow for easier understanding of memcg writeback operation. ... +/* + * Return the number of additional pages that the @memcg cgroup could allocate. + * If use_hierarchy is set, then this involves checking parent mem cgroups to + * find the cgroup with the smallest free space. + */Comment needs revisting - use_hierarchy does not exist.quoted
+static unsigned long +mem_cgroup_hierarchical_free_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + u64 free; + unsigned long min_free; + + min_free = global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES); + + while (memcg) { + free = mem_cgroup_margin(memcg); + min_free = min_t(u64, min_free, free); + memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg); + } + + return min_free; +} + +/* + * mem_cgroup_page_stat() - get memory cgroup file cache statistics + * @memcg: memory cgroup to query + * @item: memory statistic item exported to the kernel + * + * Return the accounted statistic value. + */ +unsigned long mem_cgroup_page_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, + enum mem_cgroup_page_stat_item item) +{ + struct mem_cgroup *iter; + s64 value; + + /* + * If we're looking for dirtyable pages we need to evaluate free pages + * depending on the limit and usage of the parents first of all. + */ + if (item == MEMCG_NR_DIRTYABLE_PAGES) + value = mem_cgroup_hierarchical_free_pages(memcg); + else + value = 0; + + /* + * Recursively evaluate page statistics against all cgroup under + * hierarchy tree + */ + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) + value += mem_cgroup_local_page_stat(iter, item);What's the locking rule for for_each_mem_cgroup_tree()? It's unobvious from the code and isn't documented?
Because for_each_mem_cgroup_tree() uses rcu_read_lock() and referernce counting internally, it's not required to take any lock in callers. One rule is the caller shoud call mem_cgroup_iter_break() if he want to break the loop. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>