Re: [PATCH v9 3.2 1/9] uprobes: Install and remove breakpoints.
From: Denys Vlasenko <hidden>
Date: 2012-01-26 18:28:51
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Masami Hiramatsu [off-list ref] wrote:
(2012/01/26 0:32), Denys Vlasenko wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Denys Vlasenko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
+ /* + * Convert from rip-relative addressing to indirect addressing + * via a scratch register. Change the r/m field from 0x5 (%rip) + * to 0x0 (%rax) or 0x1 (%rcx), and squeeze out the offset field. + */ + reg = MODRM_REG(insn); + if (reg == 0) { + /* + * The register operand (if any) is either the A register + * (%rax, %eax, etc.) or (if the 0x4 bit is set in the + * REX prefix) %r8. In any case, we know the C register + * is NOT the register operand, so we use %rcx (register + * #1) for the scratch register. + */ + uprobe->arch_info.fixups = UPROBES_FIX_RIP_CX; + /* Change modrm from 00 000 101 to 00 000 001. */ + *cursor = 0x1;Hmm. I think we have a bug here. What if this instruction has REX.B = 1? Granted, REX.B = 1 has no effect on rip-relative addressing and therefore normally won't be generated by gcc/as, but still. If you replace md and r/m fields as above, you are trying to convert 0x12345678(%rip) reference to (%rcx), but if REX.B = 1, then you in fact converted it to (%r9)!Right, thanks for finding :) And %rax register reference encoding has same problem, doesn't it?
Yes. The solution is trivial: "if (REX pfx exists) REX.B = 0;" Also, I don't remember whether (%rip) addressing is affected by 0x67 (address size) prefix. If it is, then nothing needs to be done. But if there is an exception and CPU ignores 0x67 pfx for (%rip) addressing, we will need to check for and remove this pfx. Otherwise, it'll instruct to use 32-bit registers for addressing, thus it will turn our (%rax) operand into (%eax). Not good. -- vda -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>