On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:37:55AM +0800, PA!draig Brady wrote:

On 11/29/2011 03:35 PM, Jan Kara wrote:

quoted

  Someone already mentioned this earlier and I don't think I've seen a
response: Do you have a realistic usecase for this? I don't think I've ever
seen an application reading file backwards...

tac, tail -n$large, ...

Indeed!
             tac-4425  [000] 73358.419777: readahead: readahead-random(dev=0:16, ino=1548445, req=750+1, ra=750+1-0, async=0) = 1
             tac-4425  [004] 73358.442030: readahead: readahead-backwards(dev=0:16, ino=1548445, req=748+2, ra=746+5-0, async=0) = 4
             tac-4425  [004] 73358.443312: readahead: readahead-backwards(dev=0:16, ino=1548445, req=744+2, ra=726+25-0, async=0) = 20

            tail-4369  [000] 72633.696307: readahead: readahead-random(dev=0:16, ino=1548450, req=750+1, ra=750+1-0, async=0) = 1
            tail-4369  [004] 72634.042106: readahead: readahead-backwards(dev=0:16, ino=1548450, req=748+2, ra=746+5-0, async=0) = 4
            tail-4369  [004] 72634.043231: readahead: readahead-backwards(dev=0:16, ino=1548450, req=744+2, ra=726+25-0, async=0) = 20
            tail-4369  [004] 72634.176216: readahead: readahead-backwards(dev=0:16, ino=1548450, req=724+2, ra=626+125-0, async=0) = 100

However I see the readahead requests always be snapped to EOF.

So it's obvious the "snap to EOF" logic need some limiting based on
max readahead size.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>