On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 05:18:20PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:

This looks reasonable: smaller device tend to be slower (USB sticks as
well as micro/mobile/old hard disks).

Given that the non-rotational attribute is not always reported, we can
take disk size as a max readahead size hint. This patch uses a formula
that generates the following concrete limits:

Given that you mentioned the rotational flag and device size in this
mail, as well as benchmarking with an intel SSD  -  did you measure
how useful large read ahead sizes still are with highend Flash device
that have extremly high read IOP rates?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>