Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] memcg: stop vmscan when enough done.
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-11 00:00:15
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:14:25 +0200 Michal Hocko [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue 09-08-11 19:09:33, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:quoted
memcg :avoid node fallback scan if possible. Now, try_to_free_pages() scans all zonelist because the page allocator should visit all zonelists...but that behavior is harmful for memcg. Memcg just scans memory because it hits limit...no memory shortage in pased zonelist. For example, with following unbalanced nodes Node 0 Node 1 File 1G 0 Anon 200M 200M memcg will cause swap-out from Node1 at every vmscan. Another example, assume 1024 nodes system. With 1024 node system, memcg will visit 1024 nodes pages per vmscan... This is overkilling. This is why memcg's victim node selection logic doesn't work as expected. This patch is a help for stopping vmscan when we scanned enough. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <redacted>OK, I see the point. At first I was afraid that we would make a bigger pressure on the node which triggered the reclaim but as we are selecting t dynamically (mem_cgroup_select_victim_node) - round robin at the moment - it should be fair in the end. More targeted node selection should be even more efficient. I still have a concern about resize_limit code path, though. It uses memcg direct reclaim to get under the new limit (assuming it is lower than the current one). Currently we might reclaim nr_nodes * SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX while after your change we have it at SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX. This means that mem_cgroup_resize_mem_limit might fail sooner on large NUMA machines (currently it is doing 5 rounds of reclaim before it gives up). I do not consider this to be blocker but maybe we should enhance mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim with a nr_pages argument to tell it how much we want to reclaim (min(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, nr_pages)). What do you think?
Hmm,
mem_cgroup_resize_mem_limit might fail sooner on large NUMA machines
mem_cgroup_resize_limit() just checks (curusage < prevusage), then, I agree reducing the number of scan/reclaim will cause that. I agree to pass nr_pages to try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(). Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>