Thread (41 messages) 41 messages, 12 authors, 2011-06-24

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)

From: Craig Bergstrom <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-24 01:03:50

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Luck, Tony [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I don't think it makes sense to handle something like that with a list.
The compact representation currently in badram is great for that.
I'd tend to agree here.  Rick has made a convincing argument that there
are significant numbers of real world cases where a defective row/column
in a DIMM results in a predictable pattern of errors.  The ball is now
in Google's court to take a look at their systems that have high numbers
of errors to see if they can actually be described by a small number
of BadRAM patterns as Rick has claimed.
Hi All,

We (Google) are working on a data-driven answer for this question.  I know
that there has been some analysis on this topic on the past, but I don't
want to speculate until we've had some time to put all the pieces together.
 Stay tuned for specifics.

Cheers,
CraigB


-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help