Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] support for broken memory modules (BadRAM)
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-23 17:00:19
Also in:
lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-23 17:00:19
Also in:
lkml
According to Rick's reply in this thread a damaged row in a DIMM can easily cause a few thousand entries in the e820 table because it doesn't handle patterns. So the question I'm asking is, is it acceptable to have an e820 table with thousands maybe ten-thousands of entries? I really have no idea of the implications, maybe somebody else can comment on that.
I don't think it makes sense to handle something like that with a list. The compact representation currently in badram is great for that. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>