Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 6 authors, 2011-06-20

Re: mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (mm/page_cgroup.c)

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: 2011-06-16 16:51:46
Also in: linux-fsdevel, lkml

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:25:42AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 11:35 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
quoted
quoted
This patch removes definitions of node_start/end_pfn() in each archs
and defines a unified one in linux/mmzone.h. It's not under
CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES, now.
Does anyone remember *why* this did not happen in the first place? I
can't think of a good reason so I've cc'd Dave Hansen as he might
remember. 
You mean why it's not under CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES?  I'd guess it's
just because it keeps working in all configurations since the
pg_data_t->node_*_pfn entries are defined everywhere.

Is that what you're asking?
No, why was node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn() defined optionally
on a per-architecture basis?

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help