Re: [PATCH] [BUGFIX] update mm->owner even if no next owner.
From: Hiroyuki Kamezawa <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-11 00:46:42
Also in:
lkml
2011/6/11 Hugh Dickins [off-list ref]:
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:quoted
I think this can be a fix.Sorry, I think not: I've not digested your rationale, but three things stand out: 1. Why has this only just started happening? I may not have run that test on 3.0-rc1, but surely I ran it for hours with 2.6.39; maybe not with khugepaged, but certainly with ksmd.
Not sure. I pointed this just by review because I found "charge" in khugepaged is out of mmap_sem now.
2. Your hunk below:quoted
- if (!mm_need_new_owner(mm, p)) + if (!mm_need_new_owner(mm, p)) { + rcu_assign_pointer(mm->owner, NULL);is now setting mm->owner to NULL at times when we were sure it did not need updating before (task is not the owner): you're damaging mm->owner.
Ah, yes. It's my mistake.
3. There's a patch from Andrea in 3.0-rc1 which looks very likely to be relevant, 692e0b35427a "mm: thp: optimize memcg charge in khugepaged". I'll try reproducing without that tonight (I crashed in 20 minutes this morning, so it's not too hard).
Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>