Re: [PATCH 3/5] oom: create oom autogroup
From: Minchan Kim <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-22 23:21:17
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:08 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro [off-list ref] wrote:
When plenty processes (eg fork bomb) are running, the TIF_MEMDIE task never exit, at least, human feel it's never. therefore kernel become hang-up. "perf sched" tell us a hint. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Task | Runtime ms | Average delay ms | Maximum delay ms | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ python:1754 | 0.197 ms | avg: 1731.727 ms | max: 3433.805 ms | python:1843 | 0.489 ms | avg: 1707.433 ms | max: 3622.955 ms | python:1715 | 0.220 ms | avg: 1707.125 ms | max: 3623.246 ms | python:1818 | 2.127 ms | avg: 1527.331 ms | max: 3622.553 ms | ... ... Processes flood makes crazy scheduler delay. and then the victim process can't run enough. Grr. Should we do? Fortunately, we already have anti process flood framework, autogroup! This patch reuse this framework and avoid kernel live lock.
That's cool idea but I have a concern. You remove boosting priority in [2/5] and move victim tasks into autogroup. If I understand autogroup right, victim process and threads in the process take less schedule chance than now. Could it make unnecessary killing of other tasks? I am not sure. Just out of curiosity. Thanks for nice work, Kosaki. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>