Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2011-01-06

Re: CLOCK-Pro algorithm

From: Adrian McMenamin <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-06 15:10:55

On 6 January 2011 10:46, Mel Gorman [off-list ref] wrote:

The current reclaim algorithm is a mash of a number of different
algorithms with a number of modifications for catching corner cases and
various optimisations. In terms of an MSc, your best bet is to do a
general literature review of replacement algorithms and then do your
best to write a short paper describing the Linux page replacement
algorithm identifying which replacement algorithms it takes lessons
from.
Thanks for this - I am indeed reading through the various papers and other
literature (and I bought your book), though my aim with the MSc project is
slightly more abitious than maybe you are suggesting: I want to look at how
important some of the issues that are identified as common problems with
global clock and similar replacement algorithms (eg a slow response to
changes in locality) and to test whether there are some heuristics from
local replacement policies that might address them, at least in theory.

The Clock-Pro paper was an interesting read and given its claims for
improvement in the 2.4 series kernels I was interested in seeing how far the
idea had got in the 2.6 series.

Adrian
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help