Re: CLOCK-Pro algorithm
From: Mel Gorman <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-06 10:46:35
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:24:00PM +0000, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
I originally tried to send this to the addresses for Song Jiang, Feng Chen and Xiaodong Zhang on the USENIX paper but it bounced from all of them. So I hope you will indulge me if I send it to the list in the hope it might reach them. Or perhaps someone here could answer the questions below. Many thanks Adrian Dear all, I am just beginning work on an MSc project on Linux memory management and have been reading your paper to the 2005 USENIX Annual Technical Conference. I was wondering what the current status of this algorithm is as regards the Linux kernel. I can find this: http://linux-mm.org/ClockProApproximation and patches for testing with the 2.6.12 kernel but am not entirely clear as to whether this algorithm was included: certainly all the books I have read still talk of the LRU lists that are similar to the 2Q model.
The current reclaim algorithm is a mash of a number of different algorithms with a number of modifications for catching corner cases and various optimisations. In terms of an MSc, your best bet is to do a general literature review of replacement algorithms and then do your best to write a short paper describing the Linux page replacement algorithm identifying which replacement algorithms it takes lessons from. -- Mel Gorman Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>