Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core
From: Peter Zijlstra <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-14 05:05:04
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Sun, 2006-08-13 at 21:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:40:53 +0200 Peter Zijlstra [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Testcase: Mount an NBD device as sole swap device and mmap > physical RAM, then loop through touching pages only once.Fix: don't try to swap over the network. Yes, there may be some scenarios where people have no local storage, but it's reasonable to expect anyone who is using Linux as an "enterprise storage platform" to stick a local disk on the thing for swap.
I wish you were right, however there seems to be a large demand to go diskless and swap over iSCSI because disks seem to be the nr. 1 failing piece of hardware in systems these days.
That leaves MAP_SHARED, but mm-tracking-shared-dirty-pages.patch will fix that, will it not?
Will makes it less likely. One can still have memory pressure, the remaining bits of memory can still get stuck in socket queues for blocked processes. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>