Thread (128 messages) 128 messages, 16 authors, 2006-08-25

Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] Network receive deadlock prevention for NBD

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-13 09:52:54
Also in: lkml, netdev

On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 01:06:21PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru) wrote:
On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 05:46:07PM -0700, David Miller (davem@davemloft.net) wrote:
quoted
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <redacted>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 13:37:06 +0400
quoted
Does it? I though it is possible to only have 64k of working sockets per
device in TCP.
Where does this limit come from?

You think there is something magic about 64K local ports,
but if remote IP addresses in the TCP socket IDs are all
different, number of possible TCP sockets is only limited
by "number of client IPs * 64K" and ram :-)
I talked about working sockets, but not about how many of them system
can have at all :)
working -> bound.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help