Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Date: 2005-09-08 01:51:14
Also in:
lkml
On 9/8/05, Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:quoted
CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat machines. This is essential in order for the distros to support it - same will go for sparsemem.That's a different issue. The current code works if you boot a NUMA=y SPARSEMEM=y machine with a single node. The current Kconfig options also enforce that SPARSEMEM depends on NUMA on i386. Magnus would like to enable SPARSEMEM=y while CONFIG_NUMA=n. That requires some Kconfig changes, as well as an extra memory present call. I'm questioning why we need to do that when we could never do DISCONTIG=y while NUMA=n on i386.
Actually, I do not really care about the Kconfig stuff. I just added that to show you guys why and when the change in arch/i386/kernel/setup.c was needed. So my main interest is to include the fix to the single-node version of setup_memory(). This to sync up the single-node case with the multiple-node version of setup_memory(), and to make it easier for me and other people to start using sparsemem om single-node (or non-NUMA if you prefer that) configurations. / magnus -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>