Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 5 authors, 2005-09-08

Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix

From: Martin J. Bligh <hidden>
Date: 2005-09-07 18:34:55
Also in: lkml

--On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:27:54 -0700 Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
quoted
CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat
machines. This is essential in order for the distros to support it - same
will go for sparsemem.
That's a different issue.  The current code works if you boot a NUMA=y
SPARSEMEM=y machine with a single node.  The current Kconfig options
also enforce that SPARSEMEM depends on NUMA on i386.

Magnus would like to enable SPARSEMEM=y while CONFIG_NUMA=n.  That
requires some Kconfig changes, as well as an extra memory present call.
I'm questioning why we need to do that when we could never do
DISCONTIG=y while NUMA=n on i386.
Ah, OK - makes more sense. However, some machines do have large holes
in e820 map setups - is not really critical, more of an efficiency
thing.

M.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help