Re: [PATCH] i386: single node SPARSEMEM fix
From: Martin J. Bligh <hidden>
Date: 2005-09-07 18:34:55
Also in:
lkml
--On Wednesday, September 07, 2005 11:27:54 -0700 Dave Hansen [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 11:22 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:quoted
CONFIG_NUMA was meant to (and did at one point) support both NUMA and flat machines. This is essential in order for the distros to support it - same will go for sparsemem.That's a different issue. The current code works if you boot a NUMA=y SPARSEMEM=y machine with a single node. The current Kconfig options also enforce that SPARSEMEM depends on NUMA on i386. Magnus would like to enable SPARSEMEM=y while CONFIG_NUMA=n. That requires some Kconfig changes, as well as an extra memory present call. I'm questioning why we need to do that when we could never do DISCONTIG=y while NUMA=n on i386.
Ah, OK - makes more sense. However, some machines do have large holes in e820 map setups - is not really critical, more of an efficiency thing. M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>