Re: [RFC][patch 0/2] mm: remove PageReserved
From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-09 05:00:07
Also in:
lkml
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi. On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 07:09, Daniel Phillips wrote:quoted
quoted
It doesn't look like they'll be able to easily free up a page flag for 2 reasons. First, PageReserved will probably be kept around for at least one release. Second, swsusp and some arch code (ioremap) wants to know about struct pages that don't point to valid RAM - currently they use PageReserved, but we'll probably just introduce a PageValidRAM or something when PageReserved goes.Changing the e820 code so it sets PageNosave instead of PageReserved, along with a couple of modifications in swsusp itself should get rid of the swsusp dependency.
That would work for swsusp, but there are other users that want to know if a struct page is valid ram (eg. ioremap), so in that case swsusp would not be able to mess with the flag. I do think swsusp should (and can, quite easily though I may have missed something) consolidate PG_nosave and PG_nosave_free, however that's out of the scope of this patch. Thanks, Nick -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>