Re: [RFT][PATCH 2/2] pagefault scalability alternative
From: Nick Piggin <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-23 13:29:10
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Nick Piggin wrote:quoted
Which brings up another issue - this surely conflicts rather badly with PageReserved removal :( Not that there is anything wrong with that, but I don't like to create these kinds of problems for people...Conflicts in the sense that I'm messing all over source files which removing PageReserved touches? Or in some deeper sense, that it makes the whole project of removing PageReserved more difficult (I don't see how)?
No, just diff conflicts.
quoted
Do we still want to remove PageReserved sooner rather than later?I'd say remove PageReserved sooner; or at least your "remove it from the core" subset.
OK so long as you're still happy with that. You'd been a bit quiet on the subject and I had just been assuming that's because you've got no more big objections to it. Just wanted to clarify - thanks. -- SUSE Labs, Novell Inc. Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>