Re: [RFT][PATCH 2/2] pagefault scalability alternative
From: Hugh Dickins <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-23 07:01:41
From: Hugh Dickins <hidden>
Date: 2005-08-23 07:01:41
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
Hmm - this means that a large munmap has to take another lock for each freed page right? That could get a bit expensive.
I do hope not! Where do you see that extra lock per page? (The patch doesn't bring in locking per page-table-entry, just locking per page-table.) Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>