Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 5 authors, 2004-08-24

Re: [RFC] free_area[] bitmap elimination [0/3]

From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-23 15:00:43

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 07:36, Dave Hansen wrote:
I'll try and give these patches a run on a NUMA-Q today.  Those machines
are very cache-sensitive and should magnify any positive or negative
effects.  
DISCLAIMER: SPEC(tm) and the benchmark name SDET(tm) are registered 
trademarks of the Standard Performance Evaluation Corporation. This 
benchmarking was performed for research purposes only, and the run
results are non-compliant and not-comparable with any published results.

Scripts: 32     
Iterations: 40
                      2.6.8.1- | 2.6.8.1-
                      vanilla  | nofreemap
                    -----------+-----------
Average Throughput:   18836.68 |  18839.37
Standard Deviation:    1538.89 |   1791.29

No statistically different results.  Very cool.

-- Dave

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help