Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [RFC] free_area[] bitmap elimination [0/3]
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-21 05:37:35
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
quoted
In __free_pages_bulk() changing BUG_ON(bad_range(zone, buddy1)) to if (bad_range(zone, buddy1)) break; should fix this. The start of the zone must be aligned to MAX_ORDER so buddy2 doesn't need checks. It may be worthwhile to make a distinction the bounds checks and the zone check and to BUG_ON() the zone check in isolation and not repeat the bounds check for the validity check.
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 02:37:56PM +0900, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
Okay, I understand several BUG_ON() are needless. I'll be more carefull to recognize what is checked.
It's not that it's needless, it's that beforehand the bitmap rounding up to an even number ensured the __test_and_change_bit() check would prevent the bounds check from ever failing, but after the bitmap is eliminated, the bounds check is needed to see if we're even examining a valid page structure for whether the page can be merged. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>