Re: [PATCH] 1/4: rework alloc_pages
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-06 05:19:58
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2004-08-06 05:19:58
Nick Piggin [off-list ref] wrote:
Previously the ->protection[] logic was broken. It was difficult to follow and basically didn't use the asynch reclaim watermarks properly.
eh? Broken how? What is an "asynch reclaim watermark"?
This one uses ->protection only for lower-zone protection, and gives the allocator flexibility to add the watermarks as desired.
eh? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>