Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems
From: Alok Mooley <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-05 05:19:12
Also in:
lkml
--- Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:54, Alok Mooley wrote:quoted
--- Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:Depending on the quantity of work that you're trying to do at once, this might be unavoidable. I know it's a difficult thing to think about, but I still don't understand the precise cases that you're concerned about. Page faults to me seem like the least of your problems. A bigger issue would be if the page is written to by userspace after you copy, but before you install the new pte. Did I miss the code in your patch that invalidated the old tlb entries?
This is a non issue for us right now, since we update the ptes in a lock, & so no one can access it before it is completely updated. Yes, we invalidate the old tlb entries as well as the cache entries as reqd. on some other architectures. -Alok __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>