Thread (34 messages) 34 messages, 12 authors, 2004-02-05

Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems

From: Alok Mooley <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-05 05:19:12
Also in: lkml

--- Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 10:54, Alok Mooley wrote:
quoted
--- Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
Depending on the quantity of work that you're trying
to do at once, this
might be unavoidable.  

I know it's a difficult thing to think about, but I
still don't
understand the precise cases that you're concerned
about.  Page faults
to me seem like the least of your problems.  A
bigger issue would be if
the page is written to by userspace after you copy,
but before you
install the new pte.  Did I miss the code in your
patch that invalidated
the old tlb entries?
This is a non issue for us right now, since we update
the ptes in a lock, & so no one can access it before
it is completely updated. Yes, we invalidate the old
tlb entries as well as the cache entries as reqd. on
some other architectures.

-Alok


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help