Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems
From: Dave Hansen <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-04 07:11:12
Also in:
lkml
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 22:57, IWAMOTO Toshihiro wrote:
At 03 Feb 2004 21:54:34 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:quoted
Moving file-backed pages is mostly handled already. You can do a regular page-cache lookup with find_get_page(), make your copy, invalidate the old one, then readd the new one. The invalidation can be done in the same style as shrink_list().Actually, it is a bit more complicated. I have implemented similar functionality for memory hotremoval. See my post about memory hotremoval http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=107354781130941&w=2 for details. remap_onepage() and remapd() in the patch are the main functions.
remap_onepage() is quite a function. 300 lines. It sure does cover a lot of ground. :) Defragmentation is a bit easier than removal because it isn't as mandatory. Instead of having to worry about waiting on things like writeback, the defrag code can just bail. --dave -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>