Re: 2.5.65-mm4
From: Martin J. Bligh <hidden>
Date: 2003-03-24 03:59:14
Also in:
lkml
quoted
profile from SDET 64:SDET is rather irritating because a) nobody has a copy and b) we don't even know what it does.
Yeah, I know. sorry ... I'm trying to get aim7 done instead.
and b) we don't even know what it does.
Lots of shell scripty stuff, I think.
quoted
82303 __down 42835 schedule 31323 __wake_up 26435 .text.lock.sched 15924 .text.lock.transactionBut judging by this, it's a rebadged dbench. The profile is identical.
Not sure what dbench does. But I'm probably doing lots of small reads and writes inside pagecache.
Note that the lock_kernel() contention has been drastically reduced and we're now hitting semaphore contention. Running `dbench 32' on the quad Xeon, this patch took the context switch rate from 500/sec up to 125,000/sec. I've asked Alex to put together a patch for spinlock-based locking in the block allocator (cut-n-paste from ext2).
OK, sounds like a plan. Made a huge impact for ext2, and might enable us to actually be able to see the rest of it through the sem cloud.
That will fix up lock_super(), but I suspect the main problem is the lock_journal() in journal_start(). I haven't thought about that one yet.
Thanks, M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>