Re: 2.5.65-mm4
From: Andrew Morton <hidden>
Date: 2003-03-24 03:06:42
Also in:
lkml
"Martin J. Bligh" [off-list ref] wrote:
profile from SDET 64:
SDET is rather irritating because a) nobody has a copy and b) we don't even know what it does.
82303 __down 42835 schedule 31323 __wake_up 26435 .text.lock.sched 15924 .text.lock.transaction
But judging by this, it's a rebadged dbench. The profile is identical. Note that the lock_kernel() contention has been drastically reduced and we're now hitting semaphore contention. Running `dbench 32' on the quad Xeon, this patch took the context switch rate from 500/sec up to 125,000/sec. I've asked Alex to put together a patch for spinlock-based locking in the block allocator (cut-n-paste from ext2). That will fix up lock_super(), but I suspect the main problem is the lock_journal() in journal_start(). I haven't thought about that one yet. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org">aart@kvack.org</a>