Re: [RFC] start_aggressive_readahead
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-26 06:53:25
From: Daniel Phillips <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-26 06:53:25
On Thursday 25 July 2002 18:10, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
I'm also open for a better name (I think the current one is very bad, but don't have a better idea :)). I'd also be ineterested in comments how to avoid the new function and use existing functionality for it, but I've tried to find it for a long time and didn't find something suiteable.
That's the right attitude imho. Redoing reahead needs to be a project all by itself, a fine thing to experiment with in the stable series. A bad idea that sort of works for now is better than what we've got. -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/