Re: scalable kmap (was Re: vm lock contention reduction)
From: William Lee Irwin III <hidden>
Date: 2002-07-09 06:32:16
quoted
Don't tell me those NUMAQ's are using IDE ;)No, that's one level of pain I don't have to deal with ;-) Now switched fibrechannel SANs on a machine that really needs NUMA aware multipath IO is more likely to be a problem, on the other hand ... but I can live without that for now ...quoted
But seriously, what's the problem? We really do need the big boxes to be able to test 2.5 right now, and any blockage needs to be cleared away.You really want the current list? The whole of our team is shifting focus to 2.5, which'll make life more interesting ;-)
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:15:52PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
wli might care to elaborate on 2 & 3, since I think he helped them identify / fix (helped maybe meaning did).
Oh, I forgot, there was a bad v86 info thing on the 9th cpu woken that I never finished debugging, too. And the MAX_IO_APICS issue, which is easily solved by just increasing the constant #ifdef CONFIG_MULTIQUAD as usual. This panics before console_init() though, which makes it seem more painful than it really is. Cheers, Bill -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/