On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:16:18PM +0200, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
quoted
quoted
We already check the high part of the divident against zero to avoid the
nit-picking: s/divident/dividend/
Umm, I find this embarassing (and I hesitated reaching for a dictionary
to double-check the spelling!). Indeed why would this be different from
subtrahend or minuend?
Thomas, as this mistake has spread across three out of these patches,
both in change descriptions and actual code, would you mind dropping the
series from mips-next altogether and I'll respin the series with all
these issues corrected?
I'm sorry, but I don't rebase mips-next and the patches have been pushed
out before I received this mail.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]