Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: Move MMU notifier's mmu_lock acquisition into common helper

[PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: Assert that notifier count is elevated in .change_pte() · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] KVM: Assert that notifier count is elevated in .change_pte() · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 02/10] KVM: Move x86's MMU notifier memslot walkers to generic code · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: arm64: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] KVM: arm64: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks · Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> · 2021-04-12
[PATCH v2 04/10] KVM: MIPS/MMU: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 05/10] KVM: PPC: Convert to the gfn-based MMU notifier callbacks · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 06/10] KVM: Kill off the old hva-based MMU notifier callbacks · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: Move MMU notifier's mmu_lock acquisition into common helper · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: Move MMU notifier's mmu_lock acquisition into common helper · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] KVM: Move MMU notifier's mmu_lock acquisition into common helper · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 08/10] KVM: Take mmu_lock when handling MMU notifier iff the hva hits a memslot · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
[PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 09/10] KVM: Don't take mmu_lock for range invalidation unless necessary · Wanpeng Li <hidden> · 2021-04-19
[PATCH v2 10/10] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow yielding during MMU notifier unmap/zap, if possible · Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers · Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> · 2021-04-02
Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] KVM: Consolidate and optimize MMU notifiers · Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> · 2021-04-12

From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: 2021-04-02 14:59:50
Also in: kvm, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Fri, Apr 02, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 02/04/21 02:56, Sean Christopherson wrote:

quoted

+		.handler	= (void *)kvm_null_fn,
+		.on_lock	= kvm_dec_notifier_count,
+		.flush_on_ret	= true,

Doesn't really matter since the handler is null, but I think it's cleaner to
have false here.

Agreed.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help