Re: [PATCH] locking/arch: Move qrwlock.h include after qspinlock.h

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 01:59:35PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 10/02/21 17:19, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:

quoted

quoted

  arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h  | 2 +-
  arch/mips/include/asm/spinlock.h   | 2 +-
  arch/xtensa/include/asm/spinlock.h | 2 +-
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

which tree should this go through ? I can take it via mips-next,
if everybody agrees.

The breakage is in the KVM tree, and the existing patch has acked-by from
the locking primitives folks.  So I'll queue it there in order to limit the
range that breaks bisection.

if it's not too late you can add by 

Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]