Re: [PATCH 06/10] MIPS: pm-cps: Use MIPS standard lightweight ordering barrier
From: Matt Redfearn <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-31 15:49:38
Also in:
lkml
On 31/08/16 15:28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 02:36:26PM +0100, Matt Redfearn wrote:quoted
The code previously had 0x10 as a magic number, this patch just replaces that with a #defined name. The value is documented in the MIPS64 instruction set manual, https://imgtec.com/?do-download=4302, table 6.5. This sync type has been standard since MIPSr2. That document also states that "If an implementation does not use one of these non-zero values to define a different synchronization behavior, then that non-zero value of stype must act the same as stype zero completion barrier." As such, stype_ordering can always be set to this sync type rather than setting it only for certain CPUs.
Hi Peter,
Right. We all had a bunch of fun trying to decode that manual a while back, and IIRC were left with a bunch of questions on what it all meant in 3+ CPU scenarios.
Yes, I remember that fun....
In anycase, not sure why I was Cc'ed to this patch, but in general I
Patman decided to CC you as you've touched arch/mips/include/barrier.h I suppose.
have low confidence in barrier patches that lack lots of detail. And the
code in question has woefully inadequate comments:
/* Ordering barrier */
uasm_i_sync(&p, stype_ordering);
Order what against what and why? Is my first question. A comment really
should explain.Fair enough - we'll put something together to improve the comments.
In any case, you've removed the only (runtime) assignment to the variable, it can become 'const'.
True enough. Thanks, Matt